GoThesis
    Plagiarism check

    Check your thesis for plagiarism. In one click.

    Upload your academic paper and receive a complete report in minutes – including a citation check. Secure, fast, and reliable.

    • No sign-up required
    • Automatic data deletion after the check
    • Never shared with other plagiarism checkers

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    50,000+

    papers checked

    < 5 min

    average check time

    100%

    privacy

    How it works

    Three steps to a confident submission

    No complicated setup. Just upload, run the check, and submit with confidence.

    01

    Upload your thesis

    Upload your academic paper as a PDF or Word file. Your data stays secure and confidential at all times.

    02

    AI-powered analysis

    Our algorithms compare your work against millions of academic sources and check your citation style for consistency and errors.

    03

    Detailed report

    Get a comprehensive report with source references, similarity scores, and concrete revision hints.

    Why choose GoThesis for your plagiarism check?

    More than copy-paste detection. Our technology gives you complete peace of mind before submitting your academic paper.

    Plagiarism detection

    Matched against millions of academic sources, journals, and websites.

    Citation check

    Spots missing citations, inconsistent citation styles, and errors in your bibliography.

    Results in minutes

    Under 5 minutes on average – even for long theses.

    100% privacy

    EU data storage. Your thesis is deleted automatically after the check.

    Detailed report

    Clear highlighting of every finding with exact source references.

    Every type of paper

    Bachelor's thesis, master's thesis, term paper, dissertation – all covered.

    Report

    Detailed results report

    Your report shows at a glance whether your thesis is free of plagiarism and correctly cited. Every finding is linked to its exact source.

    • Overall similarity in percent
    • Highlighting of every affected passage
    • Source references with direct links
    • Citation issues flagged per section
    Report
    Originality97% unique
    Citation checkNo issues found
    Müller (2023), p. 45
    2,1 %
    Wikipedia – Research methodology
    0,6 %
    Schmidt & Weber (2024)
    0,3 %
    Analysis
    Source coverage
    60T+ websites
    Academic journals
    16,000+
    Languages
    50+
    Citation check
    Active
    Advantages

    What sets our check apart

    Our technology combines the world's largest source comparison with a precise citation check – fast, reliable, and subscription-free.

    • Compared against 60 trillion websites & 16,000 journals
    • Citation style & source checking
    • Supports 50+ languages
    • No signup. No subscription.
    Result

    Plagiarism score & citation check

    To make it instantly clear how much of your thesis matches other sources and whether your citation style is consistent, the results are summarised at a glance.

    Result

    Plagiarism score

    3 %

    similarity detected

    Citation check

    Consistent

    citation style checked

    Text view

    Qualitative research is characterised by an interpretive approach aimed at understanding social phenomena within their natural context.

    It places the subjective experiences and meaning attributions of the actors involved at the centre of the analysis.

    Source: Flick, U. (2022), p. 34 – 87% match

    This methodological approach makes it possible to capture complex relationships in a nuanced way.

    Text analysis

    In-text highlights

    Passages identified as likely plagiarism are clearly highlighted right inside your text. Click any highlight to jump straight to the matching source and all of its details.

    Sources

    Sources at a glance

    The sources list shows every website and journal where suspected passages were taken from. As an extra aid, the matching text excerpt from each source is shown alongside.

    Sources
    Flick, U. (2022) – Qualitative Social Research
    2,1 %

    “…subjective experiences and meaning attributions of the actors involved…”

    Wikipedia – Research methodology
    0,6 %

    “…systematic approach to gaining scientific knowledge…”

    Schmidt & Weber (2024)
    0,3 %

    “…methodological triangulation as a quality criterion of qualitative research…”

    Frequently asked questions about plagiarism checking

    Everything you need to know about our plagiarism check for academic theses.

    Ready for a confident submission?

    Check your thesis for plagiarism and correct citations now. You'll know within minutes.